C4 Kills the Truth About the Supreme Court.
Channel 4's bias towards the Supreme Court's ruling on sex has long roots. In 2011 it agreed to act as a shill for the trans lobby after a "transphobic" murder which was nothing of the sort.
When the highest court in the land hands down a judgment after carefully considering a complex case you would think television journalists might listen and learn.
This wasn’t though the response of many journalists in the mainstream media who struggled either to ignore the judgment altogether or to be “even-handed” as they saw it by putting up critics to question the Court’s motivation. One of the most egregious examples of this was the coverage on Channel 4 News on the day of the ruling. The slant was shockingly blatant.
As a gaggle of trans activists, each more unhinged than the last, was encouraged to spout incoherent nonsense on a judgment about women’s rights it became clear just how deeply the channel’s journalists have been supping the trans lobby’s kool-aid.
The story of how much of our mainstream media arrived at the point where they could suggest a decision of the Supreme Court was misguided and “transphobic” is a troubling one. It features a delusional lobby group, a lawyer who liked to prostitute himself for kicks and a toxic love affair that ended in murder on the London Underground.
This process of cultural subversion began when Channel 4 became the first British media company to officially embrace the trans lobby’s agenda. A decision that would be touted as a model others should follow. Most duly did.
The subversion of Channel 4 could not have happened though without the active support of its leading journalists, none of whom would prove more enthusiastic than Krishnan Guru-Murthy.
In a recent interview Guru-Murthy revealed he counted only one politician as a friend.
A man who has been an unusually close intimate for four decades. When I tell you the name of that dumb, gay, trans-obsessed friend …the rot at Channel 4 will suddenly make a lot more sense.
