The New York Times Wakes Up. Finally.

Why did it take a ruling by the US Supreme Court for the New York Times to stand up to the trans lobby at last?

The two spectacular take-downs of trans activism in the New York Times in the last week are both welcome and important. The trans lobby will only be thrust back to the fringes of political extremism from whence it emerged….if liberal America joins the effort. Martina Navratilova and Bill Maher remain isolated exceptions.

Democrats who speak up, like brave Jonah Wheeler, continue to be cancelled.

The marked change in tone from the New York Times will surely give more people like him the confidence to take a stand. A question remains though. Why did it require a ruling by the US Supreme Court for the Times to offer full-throated criticism of the medical scandal of our time?

The tragedy is the Times tried to alert the American public to the dangers of “gender affirming healthcare for children” as far back as 2022. But after the LGBTQ+ lobby reacted angrily the paper’s management beat a retreat. Then sat on the fence. Until the Supreme Court’s ruling.

This then is the shocking story of how one of the world’s most respected newspapers and the voice of liberal America abandoned its values….and failed to protect thousands of vulnerable children it knew were at risk.